“Not on the backs of the most vulnerable in our society.”

Salisbury MP, John Glen, made the following promise back in 2010 “we must not balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable in our society”

Salisbury MP, John Glen, has consistently voted in favour of cuts to local government spending (40% since 2010) that have had a disproportionate impact on the most vulnerable in our society.

In fact John has voted in favour of every cut his government has made, irrespective of the damaging impact those cuts have had on the most vulnerable.

Those votes have included votes in favour of successive welfare changes that have disproportionally hit disabled people, such as cuts to social care and the recently passed cuts to employment support allowance. The cuts will reduce benefits by £30 a week for those in the work-related group.

John has failed to publicly acknowledge any concern about his government’s use of spin, misuse of data and misleading rhetoric to smear all benefits claimants as scroungers and skivers. [2]

We now have a budget in which George Osborne is taking $4bn from disabled people to fund tax cuts for the wealthy. Those who will benefit from the tax cuts include MPs like John Glen who have just had an 11% salary increase.

To make matters worse, the way the cuts in personal independence payments (PIP) for disabled people were announced, has inevitably caused maximum upset and fear amongst the most vulnerable in our society.

So perhaps it is time to remind Mr Glen of this promise he made in 2010:

John Glen MP – “we must not balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable in our society”

It’s time for John Glen to come clean and stand by his promise.

UPDATE (22.29 18.03.16): Since I wrote the above, the government seems to have retreated on the PIP cuts and Iain Duncan Smith has resigned stating as his reason the shambles that is George Osborne’s cuts to disability benefits.  This stretches our credulity to breaking point given that IDS has been the government cheerleader for benefit cuts and has a very nasty line in benefit scrounger rhetoric.

A more plausible explanation is that his resignation is an opportunistic but desperate attempt to distance himself from the disaster that the Department of Work and Pensions has become under his leadership. [3]

Another possibility is that his resignation may be an even more desperate attempt to give some life to his Brexit campaign by undermining his chief opponent, George Osborne.

Whatever the motives, they do not appear honourable.

 

[1] IDS loses legal challenge to keep Universal Credit problems secret: http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2016/03/17/ids-loses-legal-challenge-to-keep-universal-credit-problems

[2] The demonisation of the disabled is a chilling sign of the times: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/dec/04/ian-birrell-prejudice-against-disabled?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

[3] Universal credit is a tale of failure that’s still unfolding: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/27/unversal-credit-failure-timetable-costs-iain-duncan-smith

[4] If we are not ‘all in it together’, this is largely due to Duncan Smith: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/19/if-we-are-not-all-in-it-together-this-is-largely-due-to-duncan-smith?CMP=share_btn_tw

[5] Chancellor’s Budget giveaways failed to support an all-out assault on poverty ( Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF)): https://www.jrf.org.uk/press/chancellors-budget-giveaways-failed-support-all-out-assault-poverty?utm_content=buffer9654e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

[6] George Osborne’s credibility has been brutally exposed by the departure of the secretary of state for work and pensions: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/20/observer-editorial-ian-duncan-smith-resignation-george-osborne-credibility?CMP=share_btn_tw

The IDS way: Victorian morality, reforming zeal and gross incompetence: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/20/ids-victorian-morality-reforming-zeal-gross-incompetence?CMP=twt_a-politics_b-gdnukpolitics

Here are 15 cuts and failures Iain Duncan Smith didn’t resign over: http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/here-are-15-cuts-and-failures-iain-duncan-smith-didnt-resign-over–byx3nvyu3JZ

George Osborne’s only solution to our economic problems – more austerity. No rationale, no logic, no evidence, just the ‘right thing to do’.  Very reminiscent of Albert Einstein’s definition of insanity – “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”: http://www.reasonandreality.org/?p=4309

All that is needed for vested interests to prevail over the public interest is that good men don’t understand what the hell is going on.

CDSThe Tories (including my own MP, John Glen) have been brilliantly successful in selling us the lie that the financial crisis was caused by excessive welfare spending by the Labour party. This enabled them to sell the argument, despite all the contrary evidence, that only the Tories can be trusted with the economy. It also allowed them to get away with their phony ‘long term economic plan’ which was in reality nothing more than a doctrinaire political  programme to drastically reduce the role of democratic government and outsource it to international corporations like G4S, Capita, Virgin, Atos, Serco etc.

The reality of course is that the financial crash of 2007/8 and the resulting UK debt mountain were not caused by ‘immigrants’ or ‘welfare scroungers’ or ‘health tourists’ or ‘Polish plumbers’ or the disabled and they weren’t even caused by Labour Party spending on schools and hospitals.

The crisis (which had its foundation in the deregulation of banking and financial services in the 1980s) was caused by greed and incompetence in the banking industry. It culminated in the US where banks had lent colossal sums of money in worthless, sub prime loans and then repackaged those loans and sold them on to the rest of the global finance industry disguised as respectable investments. This was legalised fraud on a massive scale.

This is all common knowledge to those who have been paying attention so why remind ourselves yet again? Well the success of government double speak means that the underlying problems within the national and international banking and financial sectors have not been addressed and it’s looking as if the next financial crisis is just around the corner (see graph at top of page). Only this time we will be far less well placed to face the consequences.

Is Deutsche Bank the next Lehman Brothers? Who knows? Our governments are in hock to big finance. George Osborne is a politician with an ideological agenda, he is is not an economist and has no economics training. The people who caused the last financial crisis are, with only a very few exceptions, still in place, have they learnt their lesson? The regulators are controlled by the regulated and most of the potential reforms have been shelved or watered down.

The only thing we know for sure is that it is ordinary people who will pay the price for the hubris, incompetence and greed of our financial elites.

Addendum: Adair Turner (head UK regulator at the height of the 2008 crisis) told the Today programme that the idea that the public will never again be called on to bail out the banks is not only untrue but, as he put it, a “dangerous” assertion.

“Deutsche Bank Is ‘Absolutely Rock-Solid,’ Cryan Tells Employees” http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-08/deutsche-bank-says-it-has-at1-payment-capacity-of-1-1-billion

Banking failure NOT public expenditure created the financial crash and UK Debt mountain: http://www.reasonandreality.org/?p=4137

Conservatives are the party of high UK borrowing and low debt repayment, contrary to media misinformation:

All that is needed for vested interests to prevail over the public interest is that good men don’t understand what the hell is going on.

Update: 26th March 2016.  After engineering the slowest recovery in 150 years George Osborne has suddenly spotted that the economy is going pear-shaped again.  His solution – more austerity. No rationale, no logic, no evidence, just the ‘right thing to do’.   Very reminiscent of Albert Einstein’s definition of insanity – “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

 

Tim Montgomerie and his parallel universe.

 

monitie letwin

oliver letwin

I see tweets like the ones above and wonder if I live on the same planet as Tim Montgomerie. (Tory Party activist, blogger, columnist, co-founder of the Centre for Social Justice and Conservative Christian Fellowship and creator of the ConservativeHome website)

I share Tim’s concern that UK politics is well on the way to becoming as partisan and nasty as it is in the US. However it beggars belief that he should single out, as an example, the rather mild treatment received by Oliver Letwin at just the moment Lynton Crosby, the arch exponent of the ‘dark arts’, has been given a knighthood for services to the Tory Party.

All parties are guilty of misdemeanours but the reality is incontrovertible – it is the Tory party spin machine and its media supporters that are masters at cynically and ruthlessly exploiting every dirty trick in the book in their fight to gain or retain power.

It also appears that the remaining two obstacles preventing our politics becoming as dysfunctional as in the US are about to be dismantled.

We are being prepared for the destruction of public broadcasting in this country. And with the cosy relationships between the cabinet and Rupert Murdoch fully repaired it must be just a matter of time before Murdoch is allowed to grab a monopoly position in British media and introduce Fox style news and commentators. This would have happened back in 2011, facilitated by Jeremy Hunt, if the News of the World hacking of Milly Dowler’s phone had not been exposed.

Now that the farce of Levenson and Cameron’s phony promises are on the scrap heap Murdoch is free to resume where he left off.

If Tim Montgomerie really is worried about the americanisation of British politics, he needs to address his owns party’s tactics and its relationship with the right-wing press and big business lobby groups, well before worrying about the very mild treatment of Oliver Letwin.

Note: It is a matter of fact that Oliver Letwin was guilty of making what, even for the 1980s, was a racist statement and has subsequently been in a position to allow that sentiment to influence Tory policy. He is also on record, as are others in the cabinet, for being in favour of the privatisation of the NHS.  It is therefore difficult to see that the tweet Tim mentions is particularly controversial when compared to the treatment regularly dished out by the Tory spin machine, supported by the Tory press, at anyone who gets in their way.

Here’s Tim promoting a Sun headline (not a word of criticism here):

Screenshot 2016-01-18 15.12.32

 

The 5 most shocking quotes in Oliver Letwin’s ‘racist’ memo: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-5-most-shocking-quotes-in-oliver-letwins-racist-memo-a6790551.html

Banking failure NOT public expenditure created the financial crash and UK Debt

Do you want “Long Term Economic Plan” or do you want the Truth? Here’s the Truth!:  Quarterly growth was 1% when George Osborne took over from Labour. Today, over five years later, it’s just 0.5%.

It’s tiresome to have to keep pointing out that the financial crash of 2007/8 and the resulting UK debt mountain were not caused by ‘immigrants’ or ‘welfare scroungers’ or ‘health tourists’ or ‘Polish plumbers’ or the disabled and they weren’t even caused by the Labour Party.

We have short memories if we fail to remember that the crisis (which had its foundation in the deregulation of banking and financial services in the 1980s) was caused by greed and incompetence in the banking industry. It culminated in the US where banks had lent colossal sums of money in worthless, sub prime loans and then repackaged those loans and sold them on to the rest of the global finance industry disguised as respectable investments. This was legalised fraud on a massive scale.

The crisis was duplicated in the UK where Northern Rock, another bank up to its eyes in sub-prime mortgages, suffered the first run on a British Bank in over 150 years. It soon became clear that a number of our banks were on the verge of collapse and had to be bailed out by the tax payer. The resulting recession meant that tax receipts dropped, welfare payments increased and the deficit went through the roof as the economy was hit for six.

Let’s also remember that by 2010, under Labour, we were in recovery and that it was George Osborne’s misguided reliance on austerity (2010 -2013) that stifled the recovery, left us teetering on the verge of  recession and lost us our triple A credit rating.  All countries eventually recover from recession, only the Tories could try to take credit for two wasted years and the longest UK recovery in over 150 years.

It is  annoying but hardly surprising that regardless of how much evidence you produce it is impossible to shift the minds of those who live in that alternative universe created by the Daily Mail and the Tory spin machine.

However it is particularly galling that during the General Election, and even, during the party leadership campaign, little effort was made by Labour party leaders to counter the barrage of lies and false statistics from the Tories and their friends in the media.

What happened to the bankers who led us into this mess? Northern Rock, once a respectable building society, was demutualised in the 1990s.  Under the leadership of Matt Ridley, Northern Rock developed a business model that involved borrowing heavily, selling large quantities of sub-prime mortgages and then reselling them on the international markets. When the market for those ‘securitised loans’ collapsed, Northern Rock was insolvent, there was a run on the bank and Matt Ridley had to go cap in hand to the UK government for a bail out.

Where is Matt Ridley now?  Is he hiding penniless and in shame some where? Oh you needn’t have worried, a group of Tory hereditary peers elected him into the Lords.  He can now live quite well on £300 a day attendance allowance courtesy of the tax payer. That will go nicely with the income he gets from the opencast coal mine on his estate in Northumberland while he acts as Tory party climate change adviser.

And before you ask – yes – Viscount Matt Ridley voted in favour of tax credit cuts for millions of low paid hard-working families.

 

 

The charts below show how the financial crisis and UK Debt were not caused by excessive borrowing or spending prior to 2007 (source: UK Office for National Statistics).

 

CFb3_8tWYAAQVI5 CFb3_88WMAIY5TZ CFb3_89WAAAqGtj

GDP-2008-15
Click to enlarge

Further reading:

Here’s what the last governor of the Bank of England thinks – ‘Labour not responsible for crash’, says former Bank of England governor: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/29/labour-government-not-responsible-crash-bank-england-governor-mervyn-king

Office for Budget Responsibility chief  rebukes Osborne: the UK was never at risk of bankruptcy:  http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2012/12/obr-head-rebukes-osborne-uk-was-never-risk-bankruptcy

Here’s a summary of the Reality: The last government did not borrow excessively and it was the banking crisis that caused the recession.
http://www.neweconomics.org/blog/entry/mythbusters-excessive-government-borrowing-got-us-into-this-mess

 Here’s the full anaylsis – “Did excessive government borrowing got us into this mess” Charlie Cooper and Simon Wren-Lewis: http://dnwssx4l7gl7s.cloudfront.net/nefoundation/default/page/-/publications/Excessive%20borrowing%20got%20us%20into%20this%20mess.pdf

Labour is being far too reticent: it didn’t cause the global financial crisis and Coalition austerity policies have stalled the recoveryhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/david-blanchflower/david-blanchflower-labour-is-being-far-too-reticent-it-didnt-cause-the-global-financial-crisis-and-coalition-austerity-policies-have-stalled-the-recovery-10158888.html

 

Update: The strange, sad moral and intellectual collapse of Labour moderates”:

 

Britain’s support for Saudi Arabia shames us all and seriously undermines our security.

Yahya Maasar and his family live in the ruins of their neighbours house with no power or water, after their own was destroyed by Saudi bombing. Faj Attan is one of the most heavily bombed areas in Sanaa city despite the danger of regular attacks they have no money to move away from the area.
Yahya Maasar and his family live in the ruins of their neighbours house with no power or water, after their own was destroyed by Saudi bombing. Faj Attan is one of the most heavily bombed areas in Sanaa city despite the danger of regular attacks they have no money to move away from the area.

(Sept 2015)

Saudi Arabia is a brutal, fanatical, fundamentalist religious tyranny where torture and execution are the norm and women are treated as chattel. It is about to behead and crucify a young man for being linked to a dissident group and is currently engaged in an indiscriminate bombing campaign in Yemen.

Saudi Arabia is a major funder of terrorism and violence in the Middle East.

Saudi Arabian sources funded Al-Qaida.

All but one of the 9/11 perpetrators were Saudi Arabian.

Saudi  Arabia has directly interfered in our judicial system by insisting, successfully, that an investigation into BAe – Saudi corruption be quashed.

And yet UK governments, both past and present, have supported this regime, selling it military hardware (£1.6bn in 2014) and providing a cloak of respectability.

UK & Saudi Ministers of Justice
Chris Grayling & Saudi Minister of Justice sign deal.

In 2014 the then justice sectary, Chris Grayling, signed a £5.9m commercial agreement with the Saudis in which we will sell our ‘prison and probation expertise’ to the Saudi prison service. Yes, the same prison service that has already executed more than 150 people this year. One of the victims was ‘guilty’ of ripping up a Koran and hitting it with his shoe.

Our government has refused to back out of this shameful deal. It has even removed all reference to its previous policy of being “opposed to the death penalty in all circumstances as a matter of principle”. Yet another example of putting commercial interests above all else?

Now we find out that David Cameron has entered into a secret deal with the Saudis to procure them a place on the UN human rights council.  This is a travesty and can only be described as Cameron putting two fingers up to human rights and the long and honourable record of the UK in developing and promoting human rights around the world.  It’s no surprise that the Tories want to scrap our own Human Rights Act.

(UPDATE (2nd Oct): It seems that our government has also done a secret deal with the Saudi police force – see link below)

How long before Saudi Arabia is another middle eastern failed state collapsing into chaos and embroiling us in yet another humanitarian disaster.

The Tories tell us that security interests necessitate our support for Saudi Arabia. That story appears increasingly implausible.

The government’s previously hard-line stance on migrants and refugees suddenly did a U turn when the public were shocked into action by the photo of the little boy washed up on a beach.  David Cameron then suddenly ‘remembered’ that we were contributing  significant sums of money to help fund refugee camps. This contribution is commendable but it is also shameful that the amount of aid we give is less than the value of our arms sales to Saudi Arabia alone.  Those arms sales are currently laying the seeds for the next refugee crisis.

 

Refs:

UK and Saudi Arabia ‘in secret deal’ over human rights council place: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/29/uk-and-saudi-arabia-in-secret-deal-over-human-rights-council-place?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

The Human Cost of Saudi Arabia’s Air War in Yemen, in Photos: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/09/yemen-saudi-arabia-bombing-war-civilians

George Osborne praised by China for ignoring human rights:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11890958/George-Osborne-praised-by-China-for-ignoring-human-rights.html

Is Chris Grayling happy to do business with a prison service that flogs, stones and beheads its inmates?  http://www.reasonandreality.org/?p=3911

The story of the unfortunate MoJ and Saudi commercial proposal:  http://jackofkent.com/tag/chris-grayling/

Salisbury Amnesty International – What is the Foreign Office’s policy on human rights?  http://salisburyai.com/2015/10/01/what-is-the-foreign-offices-policy-on-human-rights/

Britain Backtracks on Justice for #Yemen: https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/10/01/dispatches-britain-backtracks-justice-yemen

UPDATE (2nd Oct): It seems that our government has also done a secret deal with the Saudi police force:

Atheism and Science

Recently I came across the tweet  shown below and not for the first or last time it left me wondering if there is something wrong with my critical thinking skills.
Christian Guy (yes that appears to be his real name) is a new Special Adviser to Prime Minister David Cameron. He previously led the Centre for Social Justice so must know what he is talking about. However his praise for the quote shown below (taken from Prof John Lennox on faith, atheism and science, from his recent ‘Against the Flow’ lecture) left me puzzled.
As far as I can see the extract starts by attacking some ‘straw man’ arguments based on a misunderstanding of the term atheism and the process of science. It then goes on to quote a made up story that could not have taken place with real scientists and finishes with a statement that is not supported by the quoted text.

Christian Guy ‏@ChristianGuy_  Aug 3 Brilliant by @ProfJohnLennox on faith, atheism and science, from his recent 'Against the Flow' lecture.

My responses to the quoted extract:

  • Atheism is not the denial of the existence of God it is a disbelief in God. Disbelief is not the same as denial, it’s the absence of belief. It does not involve faith.  (Atheism is a faith the way that “not skiing” is a hobby.*)
  • We do not need faith to do science.  We do not need faith that the universe is accessible by the human mind.  We may work on this assumption backed up by evidence. Our mobile phones depend on relativity and quantum mechanics. The observable fact that these theories are so successful would seem to be strong evidence that our understanding is linked in some way to how the universe actually works. But we are not naive, science teaches us humility. We can’t be sure that our scientific progress is moving us closer to understanding the universe. We can’t even be sure that human minds are capable of understanding the universe or answering the fundamental questions about the universe.  We carry on – driven by curiosity, hope and evidence but not faith. Above all, a good scientist has the humility to accept that he or she may be mistaken.
  • No one believes that the “brain is the end product of a mindless unguided process” This is not a sufficient description of the process of evolution.
  • The final few concluding sentences do not seem to be supported by, or related to, any of the points in the selected passage.

I would be grateful if someone would let me know where I have made a mistake in my understanding of the text, or in my logic or reasoning.

In particular I would appreciate it if anyone could explain to me why the extract is “brilliant”.

I am not trying to be rude or offensive or a troll. I am simply puzzled that people who are clearly intelligent, well educated and have positions of power or influence can hold views that, as far as I can see, are self evidently flawed.

(* Quote attributed to Ricky Gervais)

Government role for John Glen MP

johnglendailymailSalisbury MP John Glen has been appointed as Parliamentary Private Secretary (PPS) to Business Secretary Sajid Javid.   This reminds me of John’s claim back in 2010 when he said: ‘I don’t anticipate any early calls to Government. I’m a white, Christian, married bloke from the Home Counties so I probably don’t fit the description of what the leadership wants at the moment.

I have covered this disingenuous claim of downtrodden white middle class victimhood in detail here: Cameron won’t make me a Minister… I’m a white, Christian, married, bloke from the Home Counties says Tory MP, John Glen.

2015 CabinetWith the arrival of the new Tory government we find only a third of the new Cabinet are women and just two, Sajid Javid and Priti Patel, are from ethnic minority backgrounds.

I wonder what John’s new boss Sajid (son of a bus driver and state school educated) thinks about John’s claim that white, middle class, married Christians from the home counties are so hard done by?

 

 

 

Cameron won’t make me a Minister… I’m a white, Christian, married, bloke from the Home Counties says Tory MP, John Glen:  http://www.reasonandreality.org/?p=1494 

Government role for Glen (Salisbury Journal 25th May 2015): 
http://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/12966778.Government_role_for_Glen/

Before entering politics Sajid Javid was a managing director at Deutsche Bank who have just been issued with the largest fine of any bank for rigging international bank offer rates and lying to regulators:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2015/04/25/deutsche-banks-record-fine-reveals-its-rotten-heart/

John Glen named as one of the ‘most responsive’ MPs in the country

“CONSERVATIVE election candidate John Glen received a pre-election boost after a survey by a political website found him to be the fourth ‘most responsive’ MP in the country.” Salisbury Journal: http://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/12882689.John_Glen_named_as_one_of_the__most_responsive__MPs_in_the_country/?action=success#comments

John should indeed be congratulated on his achievement which I can verify from my own experience. However this is little consolation when his replies invariably follow his own party line.

There is more to being an MP than replying to emails.

Salisbury MP, John Glen, has a 100% record of voting with the government. He has never rebelled against his party. The only times he has voted independently was when there was a free vote and he voted against the Equal Marriage Bill and against allowing mitochondrial donation as a treatment to prevent mitochondrial disease.

He voted in favour of the Health and Social Care Bill which, despite the absence of a democratic mandate and despite promises to contrary, is forcing through a £3.5 Billion top down reorganisation of the NHS and its rapid outsourcing to unaccountable international corporations.

He voted for welfare reforms which indiscriminately hit the low paid and vulnerable.

He voted in favour of the current debt fuelled boom in London house prices – yet another bubble that will burst without solving our catastrophic lack of affordable homes.

He was in favour of the appointment of tobacco lobbyist Lynton Crosby as Tory campaign manager and has done nothing to tone down his party’s vindictive and divisive rhetoric or the accompanying output of misinformation and made up statistics.

He voted to down grade commitments to ‘eradicate fuel poverty’.

He also voted in favour of the lobbying bill, which will do nothing to prevent big companies and wealthy individuals from influencing government but will stifle criticism from grass roots organizations and charities.

In short, the evidence suggests that Mr Glen has put his party before his constituents.

MPs are in parliament to hold governments to account on behalf of their constituents.  If they put party loyalty and ideology ahead of the welfare of ordinary citizens I suggest they should be paid from their party funds not the taxes of hard working families who are striving to cope with an unnecessary and deliberately prolonged period of austerity for which they were not to blame.

Other votes by John Glen:

Tues 7th Jan 2014: Voted against a motion to improve compensation to sufferers of Asbestosis and extend a levy on the insurance industry to pay for research into the deadly disease and its causes. (Bid to increase compensation for asbestos victims fails in Commons: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10919958._/) Northern Echo 8th Jan 2014.   (Dr Sarah Wollaston supported this motion as did a few other rebel Tories)
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140107/debtext/140107-0002.htm#14010751000002

Wed 8th Jan 2014: Voted against a proposal to give local councils greater powers to restrict the proliferation of betting shops containing Fixed Odd Betting terminals (FOBT)s.  http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/hansard/commons/todays-commons-debates/read/unknown/669/

 

Tory MP, Dr Sarah Wollaston MP demonstrates how to hold her own government to account when they get things wrong:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10558580/The-Government-has-failed-to-lead-by-example-on-open-data.html  Daily Telegraph 08 Jan 2014.

See also:  BMJ investigation reveals the “cosy relationship” between the alcohol industry and the British government http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/article-clusters/alcohol

Here is another example of how MPs should be doing their job.  If only we had more MPs in all parties that were prepared to put reason and evidence before party dogma or self interest:   “Plain packaging and minimum unit pricing for alcohol killed off – The only winners, big tobacco, big alcohol and big undertakers“. (Dr Sarah Wollaston, July 2013) http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/15/tobacco-alcohol-public-health-minimum-alcohol-pricing

 

Man punches another man – people sign petition in support of man who was punched. Oh no wait a minute…

A man with a history of drink driving offences starts a petition for another man who, in a fit of temper, punched someone at work sending them to A&E. Hundreds of thousands enthusiastically sign the petition. Have I missed something?

Apparently Jeremy Clarkson punched someone at work.

Paul Staines (aka Guido Fawkes) – extreme right wing blogger and  a man with a history of repeat drink driving [*] offences starts a petition in support, not of the man who was hit, but in support of Jeremy Clarkson.

Our Prime Minister, David Cameron, who refuses to discuss real issues, rushes to appear on TV, not to support the man who was hit, but to support Jeremy Clarkson – doesn’t even bother to mention the person who was punched.

The establishment of this country takes us for fools.  (and make no mistake, Jeremy Clarkson and Paul Staines are the establishment, even though they desperately pretend otherwise).

 

 

[*] In 2002, Paul Staines was banned from driving for 12 months for driving under the influence.

[*] In 2008, Paul Staines was again convicted of driving under the influence, his fourth alcohol-related offence and second drink-driving incident since he was banned from driving in 2002. He was also driving without insurance and narrowly escaped jail.